A Serious Man

Looking for 436270

Rabbi Nachtner : You know Lee Sussman. Larry Gopnik : Doctor Sussman? I think I - yeah. Rabbi Nachtner : Did he ever tell you about the goy's teeth? Larry Gopnik : No I- What goy? Rabbi Nachtner : So Lee is at work one day; you know he has the orthodontic practice there at Great Bear.

A minute ago leave us a message here after that we will work on getting you verified. Blending dark humor with deeply personal themes, the Coen brothers bring what might be their most adult -- if not their best -- film to date. Read critic reviews. Rate this movie. Oof, that was Rotten. Meh, it passed the age.

A Serious Man isn't a movie en route for be solved. It's a film so as to revels in its paradoxes because those paradoxes illustrate what it means en route for be Jewish right from the aperture parable about the dybbuk. Arguably Joel and Ethan Coen 's most at an angle movie since Barton Fink , A Serious Man is also the brothers' most straightforward examination of their Jewish upbringing and how it crashes ahead against their American roots. To be Jewish is itself a paradox—an foreigner always living among other communities ahead of you for the inevitable next exodus, an exodus that's also key to your identity. To understand A Serious Be in charge of , or at least to accept its paradoxes, we must first air to its opening scenes, which break down us into a paradox within a paradox. The film's epigraph quotes the Rashi, a medieval French rabbi who wrote extensively on the Talmud books of Jewish law and the Tanakh the canonical collection of Hebrew scriptures including the Torah , Receive along with simplicity everything that happens to you, and then we get the allegory of the dybbuk, a tone-setting foreword that refuses to be received along with simplicity. Velvel tells Dora that Traitle Groshkover Fyvush Finkel just helped him with his broken cart on the way home and he's invited Groshkover over for soup to repay his kindness. Dora tells Velvel that Groshkover died three years ago, and so as to Velvel was interacting with a dybbuk, an evil spirit. Velvel thinks his wife is being silly, but after Groshkover comes over, she stabs the man she believes to a dybbuk.

We have that well of tradition en route for draw on, to help us absorb. When we're puzzled we have altogether the stories that have been handed down from people who had the same problems. Larry Gopnik didn't accomplish anything. In the whole movie he doesn't do anything. Not much of anything, anyway. He just wants en route for understand what is happening to him. So, every time he protests so as to he didn't do anything, he's actually asking a related question: What did I do to deserve this?